{"id":"W1568029770","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v27i2/3.183306","title":"Philosophical Literacy: Dialogue on a Pedagogical Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Negotiation; Curriculum; Literacy; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Information literacy; Sociology; Higher education; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03485958,0.0009566161,0.001536001,0.001172657,0.00573373,0.00657345,0.003145569,0.006288361,0.01396124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08715979,0.001026066,0.0007217306,0.001138571,0.008170723,0.006201888,0.007309207,0.006776831,0.001855092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002566304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002799947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009739167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008872168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.962229,0.02974967,0.001381599,0.002238163,0.002924408,0.00147711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8414896,0.1414932,0.002791818,0.00633787,0.003632029,0.004255394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01489607,0.1357048,0.0141326,0.0033455,0.0001431632,0.002274786,0.5667713,0.00544965,0.03769403,0.1053528,0.007750863,0.1064847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05100422,0.1823368,0.03030853,0.002459359,0.0005096062,0.001681155,0.2384665,0.03301625,0.07379748,0.1490803,0.2361191,0.001220717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529697,0.0001503501,0.01036294,0.002790343,0.0002883782,0.007166758,0.0002788508,0.0001769607,0.02581578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473027,0.000225608,0.02616126,0.001676267,0.0001854958,0.01662945,0.0001847297,0.0001015218,0.007532813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03485958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1843573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1301605360348089,"score_gpt":0.4437822351613616,"score_spread":0.3136216991265526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}