{"id":"W1568302852","doi":"10.1002/hec.2942","title":"PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE IN GERMANY: THE IGNORED RISK SELECTION PROBLEM","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Private insurance; Actuarial science; Health insurance; German; Business; Adverse selection; Group insurance; Health care; Competition (biology); Public health; Shock (circulatory); General insurance; Economics; Finance; Public economics; Insurance policy; Income protection insurance; Economic growth; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987885,0.000172462,0.0004632446,0.0002771669,0.0003718489,0.0001536128,0.0001947665,0.00007992799,0.00005694923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005372623,0.0001750484,0.00004263741,0.0002527565,0.00005649907,0.0004345487,0.00008263977,0.0003343673,0.000299218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005824337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05482623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01443998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974981,0.0001128607,0.001157213,0.0004727453,0.00001893128,0.0007401633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984761,0.00006787785,0.0008579548,0.0003143671,0.00001817323,0.0002655174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007362964,0.00008475566,0.3206391,0.0003347461,0.00002657756,1.500652e-7,0.001703354,0.0001781691,1.099596e-7,0.5609906,0.002636434,0.1133986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005510407,0.0001281668,0.6822862,0.00001973126,3.965259e-7,0.000003979445,0.00009905577,0.008377153,4.221938e-7,0.07964066,0.2286938,0.0001994182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8076875,0.002996583,0.0005401555,0.184074,0.0002789446,0.002052797,0.0001080953,0.00006621686,0.00219568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674059,0.01758686,0.001177808,0.01323851,0.0001108639,0.0003133814,0.00001023105,0.00003046942,0.0001259636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4813499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06644790966699703,"score_gpt":0.2602267069422005,"score_spread":0.1937787972752034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}