{"id":"W1568911823","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.193828","title":"An Analysis of Own Account Trading by Dual Traders in Futures Markets: A Bayesian Approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Dual (grammatical number); Commission; Algorithmic trading; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Market liquidity; Financial economics; Business; Database transaction; Alternative trading system; High-frequency trading; Transaction data; Electronic trading; Open outcry; Economics; Bayesian probability; Finance; Computer science; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007802105,0.001431085,0.003647489,0.001940029,0.001177003,0.004261313,0.003238933,0.003942273,0.004913027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03063105,0.002731945,0.002502695,0.001571866,0.002933823,0.009107433,0.002558637,0.003471589,0.0004019203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001576532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001823371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01013918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007100861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981881,0.0009137276,0.00007540367,0.0002697434,0.0002797011,0.0002732135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97932,0.01719521,0.001367168,0.0005427842,0.0008539397,0.000720855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003946894,0.0002139622,0.003966118,0.0001265221,0.0002366891,0.0004730883,0.000248654,0.69156,0.001350098,0.2866894,0.001783772,0.01295711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002870918,0.0000208449,0.0004295175,0.000007746441,0.00002834701,0.00003613339,0.00001939955,0.9604507,0.00008939364,0.03869164,0.0001729002,0.00002464027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4239052,0.002396734,0.5576158,0.003501693,0.0001305391,0.0001104694,0.0003326674,0.0002084412,0.01179847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540576,0.001574031,0.03198029,0.0001571997,0.0002934929,0.00008130439,0.0002203772,0.0001161397,0.01151957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04126191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0095092443728019,"score_gpt":0.2044381522170235,"score_spread":0.1949289078442216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}