{"id":"W1569251853","doi":"","title":"The Legal Genealogy of the Duty to Accommodate American and Canadian Workers with Disabilities: A Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Doctrine; Accommodation; Argument (complex analysis); Free Exercise Clause; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Sociology; First amendment; Supreme court; Psychology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00127047,0.0001513353,0.0002418052,0.00008505063,0.005148387,0.000358159,0.001122294,0.00008961615,0.000008385226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005310565,0.0001032596,0.00005342876,0.0009193672,0.003805193,0.0009373569,0.0003998154,0.0005609862,0.000002651803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003233373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001316507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7605193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9404768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980302,0.0005425802,0.0001889198,0.0003319023,0.0004885442,0.0004178889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983273,0.000604497,0.0001541899,0.0002180088,0.0004126393,0.0002834226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004708126,0.00006618102,0.6582842,0.00000394153,0.0001112067,0.00003034709,0.08075429,0.0004248762,0.0000491668,0.2594117,0.0001649034,0.000228381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002964552,0.00005088264,0.566582,0.00005669326,0.00001836923,0.000004315701,0.3411778,0.000002168394,0.00005036355,0.0001163793,0.09149214,0.0001523974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8977381,0.00004545851,0.00000982884,0.003968564,0.000204631,0.0006608298,0.00002725956,0.00001034679,0.097335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976544,0.00001294059,0.0002528743,0.0001304364,0.0000536822,0.000003340722,0.000001591236,0.000004064661,0.001886614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03794136313233012,"score_gpt":0.3216593455414917,"score_spread":0.2837179824091616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}