{"id":"W1570235763","doi":"","title":"Collection analysis techniques used to evaluate a graduate-level toxicology collection.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Collection development; Computer science; Interlibrary loan; Notice; Citation; Strengths and weaknesses; Library science; Data science; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004099948,0.0001962478,0.0002957325,0.001618794,0.0003761422,0.0005717102,0.0005690273,0.00009656366,0.0001168922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002254339,0.000187232,0.0001601859,0.01012232,0.00003155138,0.0009264714,0.0002269813,0.0001114412,0.00008088875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002352156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004815708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003405545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001137206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979351,0.0001295314,0.0003512719,0.0005657137,0.0005124334,0.000505942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989654,0.0001332715,0.0001114799,0.0003702345,0.0001483594,0.0002712242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009503544,0.0006100165,0.02337472,0.00001562269,0.001189134,0.00002939937,0.003520376,0.0003710722,0.0001140759,0.001598492,0.4541009,0.5149812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001320706,0.0003896722,0.7678866,0.000007375979,0.000230041,0.00004838739,0.00007275175,0.03892819,0.03314051,0.00333382,0.1533105,0.001331413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3838392,0.000170381,0.3545991,0.02252967,0.00188583,0.005616057,0.00001397085,0.004097295,0.2272484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065573,0.00001453023,0.01011056,0.0009812061,0.00006804613,0.003456415,0.000003350765,0.00001410395,0.07879446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7445119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7635099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1281995747754848,"score_gpt":0.2567825596380726,"score_spread":0.1285829848625878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}