{"id":"W1570235763","doi":"","title":"Collection analysis techniques used to evaluate a graduate-level toxicology collection.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Collection development; Computer science; Interlibrary loan; Notice; Citation; Strengths and weaknesses; Library science; Data science; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.140915,0.002286454,0.002133085,0.03594202,0.005173216,0.004648001,0.002296182,0.0008858484,0.006215461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2638455,0.0009863056,0.002616649,0.03595365,0.002940163,0.003516676,0.004675834,0.002222361,0.002088631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004991767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01760129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005683713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007056157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7926665,0.09500298,0.04891685,0.006781596,0.05491427,0.001717849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.623296,0.1537867,0.03214259,0.03294663,0.156377,0.001450917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008594306,0.00120684,0.04307564,0.01728138,0.001172654,0.00056472,0.04010512,0.002002888,0.01211822,0.02060616,0.03858168,0.8224254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109588,0.006664815,0.2578183,0.01509668,0.002562087,0.001303023,0.08862559,0.01351638,0.04765955,0.03766565,0.5267539,0.001238277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08146153,0.004450305,0.5279725,0.001999029,0.001133952,0.3053403,0.02940863,0.003065672,0.04516816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06024748,0.001325857,0.7238371,0.0004310569,0.0001761473,0.2051693,0.005365334,0.0003707777,0.003076909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1281995747754848,"score_gpt":0.2567825596380726,"score_spread":0.1285829848625878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}