{"id":"W1570505895","doi":"10.1023/a:1025415730078","title":"Evolutionary Stability in the Investment-Opportunism-Retaliation Game","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Equilibrium selection; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Evolutionary game theory; Selection (genetic algorithm); Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Economics; Repeated game; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001862453,0.00007210003,0.0001624683,0.00007175133,0.0001375443,0.00004670804,0.000212742,0.00005563777,0.0001266831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001195939,0.00006011762,0.000093515,0.00006863235,0.0002457017,0.0003931571,0.00001564881,0.0001377856,0.00001468077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006986136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003082231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002143211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005507301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989127,0.0002572002,0.0004758459,0.00008869988,0.0001020886,0.0001634986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993103,0.00009848155,0.0003710317,0.0001077122,0.00005007104,0.00006247306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005722098,0.0006304483,0.50429,0.000007430573,0.00006132095,0.0000180177,0.05193832,0.00008213107,0.0009309676,0.437617,0.003279352,0.001087815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003176967,0.0007502971,0.1696332,0.00004591047,0.0001100846,0.00008027555,0.287405,0.000120416,0.00348851,0.1457872,0.3885317,0.0008703959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968933,0.0004803721,0.000006716373,0.001963878,0.0004568157,0.0001396594,0.000004433739,0.000003509854,0.02801165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982712,0.0003739515,0.0004944269,0.0007144725,0.00008288816,0.000004156363,9.036938e-7,0.000004489393,0.00005357239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3852524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2451525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08019208051458514,"score_gpt":0.3337056837355237,"score_spread":0.2535136032209386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}