{"id":"W1572156687","doi":"","title":"Revisiting an important Canadian natural experiment with new methods: an evaluation of the impact of the 1994 tax decrease on smoking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Price elasticity of demand; Population; Public economics; Econometrics; Current Population Survey; Elasticity (physics); Tax policy; Sample (material); Economic impact analysis; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Tax reform; Medicine; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09943554,0.001289482,0.001414164,0.0006912203,0.003638309,0.002187984,0.003064611,0.001804938,0.003155231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.184822,0.0005922246,0.002053647,0.001782136,0.005313027,0.001281835,0.001734366,0.003318256,0.0002432437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03197679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04252555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8924927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8667823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9210005,0.06353303,0.001277471,0.003248874,0.009136857,0.001803297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7294431,0.2288965,0.009464067,0.01543237,0.01508385,0.001680058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06121538,0.0110015,0.1213304,0.006219775,0.01128806,0.001079354,0.01335818,0.1384154,0.01408696,0.250073,0.06082872,0.3111034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0306923,0.03253578,0.3353291,0.001311186,0.009346785,0.0002673093,0.00604287,0.3120843,0.01468534,0.1066924,0.1497093,0.001303321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7844614,0.005488181,0.124004,0.01994447,0.002126471,0.01351872,0.006100954,0.0005902933,0.04376564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887938,0.001684273,0.08212217,0.006621262,0.0003549523,0.006111671,0.001818638,0.0002458329,0.01310326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1075073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5258716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07311889408701451,"score_gpt":0.4397136797497707,"score_spread":0.3665947856627562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}