{"id":"W1574453507","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1479","title":"A Comprehensive Literature Review of the Rank Reversal Phenomenon in the Analytic Hierarchy Process","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Rank (graph theory); Hierarchy; Computer science; Order (exchange); Compromise; Operations research; Process (computing); Management science; Phenomenon; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02164424,0.0005233886,0.002452181,0.003315141,0.0002552753,0.0005940583,0.004539729,0.0002175723,0.001217464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01731178,0.0002452407,0.002381467,0.01663888,0.0002641095,0.001486868,0.0004784826,0.001059386,0.00004476177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001574972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001796859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009953068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002291732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834792,0.003707546,0.005279159,0.0006265678,0.006240099,0.0006674362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826393,0.006639692,0.003996347,0.002334395,0.004064991,0.0003252588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006817681,0.01084122,0.2528921,0.004844409,0.007331856,0.001516972,0.1031511,0.01140516,0.01818258,0.0005015629,0.1053105,0.4772049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01512874,0.0006191186,0.6982785,0.04255022,0.009148083,0.002673927,0.02134897,0.07836092,0.0006706601,0.00837901,0.1204143,0.002427543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7982659,0.1570159,0.03524563,0.004855404,0.002703002,0.001432663,0.0001467978,0.00001841462,0.000316248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792265,0.006516243,0.0106178,0.003141567,0.0003142564,0.00001055367,0.000005575191,0.0000305506,0.000136938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4747774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":1,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1312149065278208,"score_gpt":0.4653644708692848,"score_spread":0.334149564341464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}