{"id":"W1575509464","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.782","title":"How do faculty members respond to their students' discussions of academic misconduct and academic integrity?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Academic institution; Qualitative research; Perception; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02055891,0.0003703287,0.000595774,0.001659938,0.009850549,0.007484718,0.001878432,0.003019361,0.003613106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09331468,0.0004713624,0.0005218785,0.001611157,0.006710677,0.004973673,0.005498847,0.003547368,0.0008205773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005024515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006143633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002584986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00420707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9690062,0.02370124,0.0009115952,0.000815704,0.002937915,0.002627352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9171656,0.0537204,0.01349912,0.002303824,0.007031371,0.006279628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008852573,0.00009083687,0.01951151,0.0001166324,0.00001545686,0.0004546697,0.9588442,0.00005934189,0.001111935,0.0007848616,0.00102186,0.01790008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000536014,0.0001039012,0.006665849,0.0001013309,0.00001151986,0.000279249,0.9832729,0.00008314344,0.001043383,0.0003624078,0.008042539,0.00002841483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845359,0.000545789,0.002286479,0.006819429,0.00013656,0.00007222607,0.0000373714,0.00004265474,0.00552363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959863,0.0003297937,0.0006639527,0.001011744,0.00006675011,0.00006236265,0.00001934408,0.00002265788,0.001837117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1087272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1208383388445477,"score_gpt":0.4745050081811505,"score_spread":0.3536666693366028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}