{"id":"W1576518232","doi":"10.1515/auk-2007-0204","title":"Non-deteriorating Choice Without Full Transitivity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyse & Kritik","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationality; Rationalizability; Status quo; Mathematical economics; Rational choice theory (criminology); Ecological rationality; Social choice theory; Element (criminal law); Economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005358225,0.0002344832,0.0005554806,0.0004416278,0.0002990491,0.0005391281,0.0007181514,0.0001464783,0.0004507314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009528113,0.0001909798,0.0003358327,0.0009858126,0.000124956,0.0006427026,0.0001001396,0.0002727334,0.0009348146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000695854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007253104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004152228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003579258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967207,0.00008815416,0.001061441,0.000750769,0.0008808829,0.0004980041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970739,0.001191556,0.000317207,0.0008416774,0.0003138142,0.0002618209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006905064,0.0001347899,0.1168565,0.000002334216,0.00002366254,0.0001165588,0.0005391244,0.00008919248,0.01874651,0.00003180464,0.00100926,0.8623812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004053123,0.001187865,0.8080296,0.0002977649,0.0005836835,0.0003479893,0.01103055,0.02643885,0.02167309,0.05711439,0.06589828,0.003344789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701783,0.00004085136,0.01995371,0.000206611,0.000350745,0.0001078603,0.00001556182,0.00006081297,0.009085559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954819,0.000003470413,0.003310283,0.0004696266,0.0002643822,0.000003202776,0.00000479892,0.00002096129,0.0004413947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8590364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1104349262001836,"score_gpt":0.4335681953750768,"score_spread":0.3231332691748932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}