{"id":"W1576875018","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2015.1017915","title":"Serving remote communities together: a Canadian joint use library study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Space (punctuation); Exploratory research; Project commissioning; Joint (building); Business; Knowledge management; Publishing; Library science; Engineering; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007466249,0.0007192317,0.001326527,0.005146633,0.04741931,0.007839661,0.003082287,0.001736264,0.0059308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01114743,0.001127802,0.0006558473,0.01241557,0.006515526,0.003812592,0.008671955,0.003229682,0.0007100906],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1083363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1444859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927016,0.001565073,0.0002228725,0.0005926652,0.001724782,0.003192993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988214,0.001685962,0.0008998549,0.0004203068,0.004344094,0.004435689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984555,0.0009508964,0.07451066,0.0003450997,0.00003320667,0.002476521,0.8881315,0.0001034948,0.0005669631,0.003747902,0.005242454,0.02369283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001990791,0.0001215884,0.04877218,0.0001475739,0.00002035405,0.0001835377,0.9373505,0.0001198209,0.00008287572,0.0001806874,0.01295631,0.000044742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834697,0.0006339146,0.0001720289,0.001638157,0.00002749446,0.0004328811,0.000249452,0.00001082917,0.01336547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910817,0.001075297,0.0004510756,0.001265327,0.00001269448,0.0002782707,0.0001742111,0.00001823945,0.005643228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7860386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1970927288597015,"score_gpt":0.3211138415281947,"score_spread":0.1240211126684931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}