{"id":"W1577243332","doi":"10.13020/d6001s","title":"2003 Rock Properties Database: Density, Magnetic Susceptibility, and Natural Remanent Magnetization of Rocks in Minnesota","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Database; Geological survey; Geology; Scale (ratio); Natural (archaeology); Remanence; Mining engineering; Computer science; Mineralogy; Magnetization; Geography; Geophysics; Business; Cartography; Physics; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003351079,0.0005360615,0.001232436,0.0005860351,0.0002021256,0.00003138994,0.0009661068,0.0004218009,0.001068409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003606441,0.0006225252,0.0002279731,0.001413429,0.0008142635,0.001016192,0.0003511354,0.0005047403,0.00005353832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003352996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002964808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01505064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03173424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969756,0.0003625382,0.0004937298,0.0009205961,0.000679002,0.0005685037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973716,0.0003447815,0.0006498323,0.0007300362,0.0006389986,0.0002647798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003792969,0.001976583,0.1284003,0.006642329,0.000371632,0.0009390494,0.001177574,0.0003606053,0.0007734947,0.00006867756,0.813881,0.04161574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006946702,0.003982484,0.3219621,0.002132226,0.001244267,0.000173769,0.007649892,0.004024191,0.00040042,0.0006112749,0.6477407,0.003131947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.5600745,0.00402547,0.0001037745,0.0003962331,0.0002889735,0.0008952601,0.4336555,0.00002780733,0.0005324785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.480478,0.008973258,0.003616707,0.0001022092,0.00007604816,1.815225e-7,0.4988516,0.00003549585,0.007866531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1935617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01202018799251805,"score_gpt":0.1795217909536416,"score_spread":0.1675016029611235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}