{"id":"W1577677152","doi":"10.5072/ulr.v2008i1.410","title":"Providing a Safe Harbor for Those Who Play by the Rules: The Case for a Strong Regulatory Compliance Defense","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Business; Environmental regulation; Risk analysis (engineering); Law and economics; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03773648,0.0007479528,0.0009861281,0.001347117,0.02143913,0.0204333,0.00380313,0.04727623,0.006007906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06661996,0.001186657,0.001513739,0.0009895189,0.0427956,0.01414635,0.01257325,0.05354356,0.001775418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006077055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02447645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02666106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0265078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9556056,0.0160017,0.001467883,0.00727589,0.009428386,0.01022051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95284,0.03209973,0.003278304,0.003077701,0.00430599,0.004398217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003510395,0.00008849968,0.002282847,0.00003495662,0.00002535863,0.001525171,0.006546049,0.0001843435,0.0003098848,0.9427368,0.03569055,0.01054043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002956666,0.0002257387,0.00378264,0.001329119,0.0001556006,0.002932386,0.0166171,0.002070674,0.001836401,0.5597559,0.4106814,0.0003174761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05670177,0.003639371,0.01295622,0.6597219,0.002007958,0.0001485572,0.00005349212,0.0001086932,0.2646621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6126045,0.001745562,0.004330787,0.3488725,0.001977893,0.0003439991,0.00005565817,0.000111048,0.02995811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04727623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.199572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05940416135352521,"score_gpt":0.2403928585076795,"score_spread":0.1809886971541543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}