{"id":"W1577864190","doi":"","title":"LA EVALUACIÓN DE LA SUSTENTABILIDAD EN PLANES URBANOS. UN RETO DE CONSTRUCCIÓN METODOLÓGICA: MONTREAL COMO CASO DE ESTUDIO","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Urban sustainability; Plan (archaeology); Inclusion (mineral); Humanities; Sustainable development; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Art; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003889954,0.0006098095,0.0002806733,0.001850147,0.003155047,0.005262177,0.001163206,0.0005837178,0.005516699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009001373,0.0003427103,0.0003436698,0.004039303,0.005812507,0.002231373,0.002653554,0.001013241,0.0002852834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02385982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01736782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7369738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8338646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970886,0.001275532,0.00007426598,0.0002786904,0.001031471,0.0002513903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962458,0.001349682,0.0005100323,0.0002379764,0.001317219,0.0003392776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004754802,0.0004502237,0.2417364,0.001524764,0.0002723849,0.0004738383,0.1399134,0.02656135,0.01000917,0.1590653,0.0193951,0.4001226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006157317,0.0007015222,0.5153982,0.0009635863,0.000271683,0.0001226654,0.2098572,0.01141304,0.01100871,0.03186246,0.2180301,0.0003092512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100625,0.004151213,0.03080707,0.007893648,0.00009087074,0.0005447338,0.001499602,0.000162307,0.1447881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796324,0.001337298,0.008144473,0.0001955452,0.0000131183,0.000155193,0.0002529382,0.00005046996,0.01021862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2630262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5291504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07674273717022233,"score_gpt":0.5067683502598954,"score_spread":0.4300256130896731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}