{"id":"W1578925422","doi":"","title":"THE ROBUSTNESS OF EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS: THE CASE OF UNDOMINATED NASH EQUILIBRIUM","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Robustness (evolution); Monotonic function; Corollary; Sequential equilibrium; Stochastic game; Social choice theory; Bayesian game; Equilibrium selection; Mathematics; Epsilon-equilibrium; Solution concept; Computer science; Repeated game; Best response; Game theory; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006311511,0.0007431323,0.001045218,0.001750814,0.0009242332,0.003641624,0.001681997,0.001900573,0.005560535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03040724,0.0004410334,0.001828376,0.0009535995,0.005471147,0.007836048,0.004635879,0.003252351,0.0005016374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001987057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006923213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009964567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004010996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937665,0.002928667,0.000383488,0.001340383,0.001140843,0.0004400773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828323,0.01057427,0.002219355,0.002780726,0.001074014,0.0005193364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003623353,0.00001718634,0.0005172787,0.00004159554,0.00003876998,0.0001041495,0.0002546899,0.02509214,0.0008195395,0.9682662,0.0001552228,0.004657036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001521411,0.00004754044,0.0003447193,0.00002524052,0.0000161555,0.00005174452,0.0001055718,0.07365374,0.001004962,0.9233886,0.001327756,0.00001878358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1845674,0.0004976043,0.7620334,0.001864046,0.00004547601,0.0001352245,0.0002273961,0.0001631982,0.05046619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619265,0.0002354849,0.03446353,0.0001627502,0.00005083693,0.0001610727,0.00007797572,0.00004030041,0.002881608],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006311511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03337884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05509382591506524,"score_gpt":0.3260607089278943,"score_spread":0.2709668830128291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}