{"id":"W1578925422","doi":"","title":"THE ROBUSTNESS OF EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS: THE CASE OF UNDOMINATED NASH EQUILIBRIUM","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Robustness (evolution); Monotonic function; Corollary; Sequential equilibrium; Stochastic game; Social choice theory; Bayesian game; Equilibrium selection; Mathematics; Epsilon-equilibrium; Solution concept; Computer science; Repeated game; Best response; Game theory; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01510438,0.0008026806,0.001745428,0.0008056351,0.001182667,0.0003903204,0.005877418,0.0007030342,0.000248151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005201445,0.000483876,0.001736159,0.004971603,0.001441658,0.0004746961,0.003933747,0.001887988,0.00008904155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001847168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001498966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008315291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001328765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887833,0.003236088,0.003452113,0.001684895,0.001985233,0.0008583766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795219,0.00897776,0.003383796,0.005715359,0.002134612,0.0002665667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008044763,0.001071908,0.0002153392,0.0002485994,0.004201739,0.0002914662,0.00004770652,0.3459535,0.04013948,0.4825782,0.0002020842,0.1242456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001958375,0.0001943696,0.001766859,0.0002686504,0.005948695,0.0004317158,0.001848202,0.03235988,0.1111782,0.8225265,0.01956863,0.001949996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744914,0.0005543202,0.00004671951,0.0002804662,0.0007305551,0.001209875,0.00282519,0.0001127489,0.01974868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954693,0.00002562797,0.0004142963,0.00005411191,0.00006596728,0.000218195,0.00007945042,0.00007837997,0.00359466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3399483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05509382591506524,"score_gpt":0.3260607089278943,"score_spread":0.2709668830128291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}