{"id":"W1579768026","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - a proposed alternative admissibility framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04997995,0.0002889881,0.0006156624,0.0001306579,0.004220596,0.0009672833,0.001860983,0.0002821227,0.0003311124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06504084,0.0001521533,0.0002851175,0.0005825615,0.00316238,0.0007289192,0.0001089553,0.00392575,0.00000436607],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000823624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006942973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2199811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.718244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889712,0.006793745,0.00139155,0.0004781552,0.001469827,0.0008955615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865681,0.01041289,0.001208542,0.0005996755,0.0006247971,0.0005859731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004792423,0.0001904471,0.0376878,0.00005124483,0.00008006287,0.00008776967,0.8202464,0.0001625212,0.0005447733,0.1387442,0.0003832045,0.001342338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389875,0.0002664084,0.03056366,0.002604077,0.000441595,0.00009219792,0.6683799,0.0007024569,0.000400451,0.2785839,0.01560505,0.0009704494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605973,0.0009705889,0.0009213081,0.02624281,0.001021624,0.001509868,0.00009885386,0.00002370315,0.008613978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984338,0.00001227221,0.0005768828,0.0004251992,0.0004631978,0.0000261019,9.814253e-7,0.00001266039,0.00004887543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4982629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1389801136684364,"score_gpt":0.3869022606896508,"score_spread":0.2479221470212145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}