{"id":"W1580040017","doi":"10.18438/b80616","title":"Information Literacy Instruction Assessment and Improvement through Evidence Based Practice: A Mixed Method Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California State University, East Bay","keywords":"Information literacy; Session (web analytics); Relevance (law); Focus group; Library instruction; Mathematics education; Psychology; Literacy; Medical education; Computer science; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Medicine; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005143838,0.0002906601,0.000247144,0.0004372194,0.001401663,0.00493833,0.0004650282,0.0001859485,0.0005500801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008044003,0.0002649156,0.00006031811,0.001304033,0.0002483067,0.8905377,0.0001969587,0.000726559,0.00006713045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004936326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001455779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002737117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.31608e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995685,0.001134565,0.001221377,0.0002655307,0.001278189,0.0004153303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918418,0.005419193,0.001413493,0.0004911129,0.0005184447,0.0003159499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008750368,0.0002948229,0.005497998,0.0002640699,0.0000435475,0.000003304125,0.03240592,0.0001684533,0.0001158076,0.581791,0.002062882,0.3764771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001126314,0.0006351143,0.02595664,0.000257523,0.00007327977,0.00001737139,0.03643307,0.01260025,0.0003910965,0.0003555343,0.9217549,0.0003988849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1801173,0.0005025899,0.1480058,0.6234711,0.005124555,0.007336625,0.00008024382,0.001182609,0.03417921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.485661,0.001707908,0.2729643,0.2387826,0.0003208093,0.000280358,0.0001250354,0.00001480033,0.0001432329],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01941937849769843,"score_gpt":0.3734938247052611,"score_spread":0.3540744462075627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}