{"id":"W158149931","doi":"10.1093/forestscience/48.4.712","title":"Economic Analysis of the Canada–United States Softwood Lumber Dispute: Playing the Quota Game","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Economic analysis; Agricultural economics; Business; Economics; Forestry; Pulp and paper industry; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001751476,0.0003627218,0.000937533,0.001716017,0.004617854,0.00636225,0.001879397,0.003104134,0.01337797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00674018,0.0003567002,0.0006752975,0.00205096,0.003102366,0.002371632,0.001237451,0.003180562,0.0003200272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03380428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02680299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8065558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.868956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987831,0.00019956,0.00002262835,0.00007152889,0.0002711671,0.0006520763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969053,0.001901653,0.0001893104,0.00006888889,0.0005016013,0.0004332515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006775627,0.0003985739,0.01342187,0.0001528758,0.00009217211,0.0007136543,0.001035554,0.06664354,0.0005849824,0.8674458,0.02916247,0.0196711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004324946,0.0003574462,0.07298006,0.0003645678,0.0005202433,0.000430189,0.02365544,0.316787,0.001365041,0.5089605,0.07388811,0.00025899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7453651,0.002712435,0.002704285,0.01490756,0.0001341309,0.0001283678,0.001055905,0.00003541163,0.2329567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850909,0.0005860326,0.0003140467,0.0003155869,0.00003327626,0.00001969529,0.0001254954,0.000009522714,0.01350554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1934442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3891668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007878832669719091,"score_gpt":0.202231732723776,"score_spread":0.1943529000540569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}