{"id":"W1582335202","doi":"10.6092/issn.1973-2201/66","title":"A modification of Silber’s algorithm to derive bounds on Gini’s concentration ratio from grouped observations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangent; Intersection (aeronautics); Mathematics; Upper and lower bounds; Lorenz curve; Combinatorics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Applied mathematics; Inequality; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Gini coefficient; Economic inequality; Chemistry; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002964947,0.0002075419,0.0005002978,0.0002918241,0.0006557981,0.0007166431,0.001415975,0.0001590014,0.001965217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001014636,0.0002078662,0.0001395004,0.001132634,0.0002151622,0.002368299,0.0001482422,0.0002337292,0.00001587311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003415722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003215334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02857243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003882834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966139,0.0004741792,0.001069363,0.000371736,0.00108587,0.0003849257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967997,0.000762621,0.0009456813,0.0003857845,0.0008175846,0.0002885961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006970055,0.001589011,0.6096646,0.00005737546,0.0003553673,0.00001227544,0.03512574,0.0006580533,0.1965209,0.03765149,0.03292206,0.08474618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004956163,0.00002741444,0.944432,0.0001459724,0.0000523469,2.300834e-7,0.001850076,0.0005007008,0.02700969,0.0135173,0.01162986,0.0003388352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442098,0.0007761582,0.03848875,0.0008286828,0.001071762,0.0009157547,0.0001573841,0.00004259938,0.01350917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953722,0.0009577118,0.001874515,0.0008888679,0.0004754876,0.00003004348,0.00007661717,0.00002109079,0.0003034916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3347674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.37306611502374,"score_gpt":0.5610341087541613,"score_spread":0.1879679937304213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}