{"id":"W1582512268","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.12077","title":"Methods to Evaluate Uptake of Engineered Nanomaterials by the Alimentary Tract","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","topic":"Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Alimentary tract; Strengths and weaknesses; Digestive tract; Biochemical engineering; Sample (material); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Biology; Psychology; Medicine; Chemistry; Engineering; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002394195,0.001041008,0.0006511568,0.002380322,0.0004384038,0.0006784089,0.0007126525,0.001170813,0.00193654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001650822,0.0004318468,0.0008018039,0.0007951657,0.0005049382,0.0007983262,0.0008948219,0.000822422,0.001047151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005199165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008033602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009687034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002403934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979964,0.0003772696,0.0001244913,0.0004058929,0.001003481,0.00009243733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989021,0.0002648232,0.0002544187,0.00009410072,0.0004440851,0.00004050322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003710754,0.0001289046,0.004526732,0.002407531,0.0001325729,0.0001549497,0.0001826086,0.0005915689,0.9154299,0.0008627185,0.0007293735,0.07448207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004198125,0.00202343,0.01263199,0.0003434247,0.0002637939,0.001138974,0.000310358,0.004050759,0.9529496,0.001134582,0.02502171,0.00008930584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1847492,0.0736791,0.7089596,0.0007367419,0.001068099,0.003455018,0.003001072,0.001799851,0.02255128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3158084,0.06104661,0.5931874,0.00096696,0.0001947132,0.005264061,0.002368741,0.0004047879,0.02075833],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002394195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01266187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07202991224226442,"score_gpt":0.3574191703462724,"score_spread":0.2853892581040079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}