{"id":"W1585750270","doi":"10.1300/j082v50n01_04","title":"Ex-Gay Rhetoric and the Politics of Sexuality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Lesbian; Newspaper; Human sexuality; Politics; Transgender; Rhetoric; Gender studies; Sexual orientation; Identity (music); Sociology; Homosexuality; Identity politics; Sexual identity; Political science; Media studies; Law; Aesthetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00345472,0.0001470507,0.0005176945,0.0001085248,0.0001649124,0.0000329988,0.0003376763,0.000136987,0.0002606209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003147563,0.00009641255,0.000134681,0.0001797687,0.0004738428,0.0001710114,0.00006342887,0.0004710558,0.00003251982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007824009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001734744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001842706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001770652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970781,0.000936377,0.001098556,0.0001455217,0.0003990104,0.0003424249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975752,0.0005873015,0.0009019658,0.0004470765,0.0002848308,0.0002036107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001130763,0.002313405,0.3834172,0.001239965,0.0007231733,0.00004426431,0.03077717,0.00001109769,0.0001547834,0.4181921,0.128915,0.03308111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007071272,0.0005790378,0.8336088,0.00002054671,0.0003603041,0.0007387272,0.002003512,0.00001205683,0.00005780951,0.03331988,0.1219237,0.0003043533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.965035,0.004624829,0.0001205988,0.009810604,0.001246035,0.0001373035,0.00003170603,0.00001010974,0.01898386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853873,0.0003394366,0.0002224162,0.0009043131,0.002372544,0.000001482044,9.97411e-7,0.0000143231,0.01075715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4501916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.393159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05581599481008318,"score_gpt":0.4126060661790237,"score_spread":0.3567900713689405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}