{"id":"W1586030185","doi":"10.1177/001979390605900306","title":"Further Evidence on the “Monday Effect” in Workers' Compensation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Earnings; Moral hazard; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Health insurance; Hazard; Medicine; Occupational safety and health; Order (exchange); Exploit; Health care; Demography; Business; Psychology; Economics; Incentive; Computer security; Social psychology; Finance; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002054161,0.00007994001,0.0001623788,0.00003848206,0.0003632072,0.00003828101,0.0001404046,0.0001532373,0.0005564743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001567187,0.00005563572,0.00003606279,0.0007372333,0.0003025256,0.0001691102,0.00001224678,0.0003311442,0.0002007063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007021824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008732967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006679168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982886,0.0009652072,0.0002416882,0.0001553763,0.0001950223,0.0001540685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982434,0.001443334,0.00010998,0.0001264564,0.00004472584,0.00003209435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005445357,0.00009344831,0.6519824,0.0000567869,0.00002292879,0.000007214955,0.003789851,0.0000424141,0.00002925643,0.1595668,0.1117032,0.07265121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006098317,0.00008771347,0.3113571,0.008147491,0.00006837377,7.061294e-7,0.0003690986,0.000004490033,0.000007564023,0.00765879,0.671435,0.0002538748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.714087,0.04872308,0.000004358309,0.1955318,0.0004836978,0.001856564,0.000006288836,0.00005856285,0.03924863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990582,0.005135462,0.00001464923,0.00176635,0.0003557566,0.00008213507,0.00000237175,0.000005527677,0.002055737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5597318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6093004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08530028514079634,"score_gpt":0.3683084449323608,"score_spread":0.2830081597915645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}