{"id":"W1586664008","doi":"10.1002/1944-2866.poi354","title":"Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Internet","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":279,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Polarization (electrochemistry); Federal election; Politics; Social media; Political science; Media studies; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003823953,0.0004665969,0.0006331556,0.009207312,0.01504655,0.009463378,0.001172973,0.0009868658,0.005670351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01061797,0.0003917808,0.0004966527,0.02057821,0.003662276,0.00412774,0.003994932,0.00167079,0.0006798086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05009722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0587258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956298,0.0009191683,0.00008753064,0.0003910696,0.001739717,0.001232825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930269,0.001513686,0.0006071788,0.000333592,0.003788731,0.0007301002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005615545,0.0001887469,0.3751247,0.0007676945,0.000207116,0.001320764,0.1271285,0.002633262,0.006727551,0.2295447,0.0546527,0.2011429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003585471,0.00007273606,0.4313183,0.0007075662,0.0001431196,0.0002746955,0.2130587,0.005756317,0.002535799,0.01985414,0.3259677,0.0002751273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5625689,0.006811499,0.006505006,0.05047142,0.0004047406,0.0003137228,0.009213716,0.0001256286,0.3635854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706853,0.004956439,0.004221012,0.002250626,0.0001300878,0.0001292173,0.001642408,0.00007778608,0.01590717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05009722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3634824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03913691328319971,"score_gpt":0.358655114676696,"score_spread":0.3195182013934963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}