{"id":"W1587612741","doi":"10.1109/iecon.2014.7049068","title":"A comparative study of synchronous reluctance machine performance with different pole numbers for automotive applications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electric Motor Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Automotive industry; Magnetic reluctance; Torque; Sizing; Torque ripple; Switched reluctance motor; Reluctance motor; Traction (geology); Rotor (electric); Magnetic gear; Synchronous motor; Point (geometry); Automotive engineering; Computer science; Engineering; Direct torque control; Mechanical engineering; Magnet; Electrical engineering; Induction motor; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007531303,0.0005209717,0.0006444806,0.0007628604,0.0002225315,0.000464679,0.0005143944,0.0005183212,0.002010613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002419784,0.0001442568,0.0003397175,0.0006223726,0.0001818429,0.000690891,0.0001668913,0.0001732528,0.0009764192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001629978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001002195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001566237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002047859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994065,0.0001643703,0.00004784692,0.00008896833,0.0002313266,0.0000609588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997986,0.0008723185,0.0001997679,0.0002465948,0.0006288586,0.00006643924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003633578,0.0002145472,0.004488087,0.001603475,0.0001230256,0.0003583618,0.0005179147,0.0327335,0.7083226,0.001231568,0.001014483,0.2457589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000161719,0.01503094,0.04943164,0.000133028,0.0004170249,0.001812437,0.0004375641,0.08070369,0.8298082,0.001036845,0.02088301,0.0001437323],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.945852,0.003045254,0.03872061,0.0001007218,0.00006350161,0.00004489487,0.0001646569,0.0006942524,0.01131413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913448,0.0004623919,0.006417995,0.000008569514,0.00001722572,0.00001249108,0.0001362534,0.00008900078,0.001511205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002010613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006726146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007856401427275556,"score_gpt":0.2216123320226827,"score_spread":0.2137559305954071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}