{"id":"W1587816057","doi":"","title":"Character Attacks as Complex Strategies of Legal Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Rhetorical question; Jury; Epistemology; Supreme court; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004672688,0.001089449,0.0005332908,0.004210919,0.002202897,0.009863245,0.001325364,0.002679429,0.00489833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021593,0.0004527664,0.0009366383,0.00195081,0.01108342,0.008242753,0.004248356,0.001825554,0.0006562155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001758044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007706379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004246568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005007531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990017,0.00632372,0.0004473556,0.0008045422,0.001842076,0.0005652914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820036,0.01141774,0.003076036,0.001840043,0.000869134,0.0007933572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006528023,0.00005065063,0.003117537,0.0001130262,0.00006043374,0.0003225366,0.01384521,0.006237846,0.002022732,0.9554556,0.0004486044,0.01826045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005523974,0.000109919,0.003422449,0.0001025663,0.00004596578,0.0004979423,0.007845993,0.04691987,0.001242418,0.9156439,0.02406125,0.00005241768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4743674,0.00119489,0.3812632,0.002635313,0.00009520596,0.0006440868,0.0001300014,0.0002984986,0.1393715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391899,0.0001958242,0.0552473,0.00009814653,0.00003478129,0.0002530956,0.00005419081,0.0000499291,0.004876927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009863245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02471185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02020244991701197,"score_gpt":0.3319621008922386,"score_spread":0.3117596509752266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}