{"id":"W1587859141","doi":"10.1080/07038992.2014.930308","title":"Assessing the Impact of Field of View on Monitoring Understory and Overstory Phenology Using Digital Repeat Photography","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Phenology; Remote sensing; Aerial photography; Field (mathematics); Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198527,0.0002624589,0.0001860041,0.0007153722,0.0002120671,0.0005382003,0.0003217747,0.000436038,0.0009158764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01038554,0.0001730781,0.0003284067,0.0003446087,0.000201573,0.000686557,0.0003994243,0.0001677391,0.0001569911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000475619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002568624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04068286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998703,0.0006194373,0.00007547381,0.0001880673,0.0003320354,0.00008189527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862336,0.009435463,0.00156349,0.0007309614,0.001641817,0.0003946416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001192373,0.000205357,0.9001551,0.00009980326,0.0003167131,0.00007506587,0.00009535352,0.01179818,0.0207087,0.00006570981,0.0003889702,0.06489865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001617096,0.0005461365,0.9761971,0.00001775835,0.0001250439,0.00009063067,0.00007594295,0.01739079,0.005129101,0.00004068563,0.0003536328,0.00001696256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951032,0.0002469136,0.003012138,0.00005034105,0.00001001412,0.00003436348,0.0004339682,0.00004161476,0.001067492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935113,0.00006942284,0.005864153,0.00003211456,0.000006794649,0.00001537292,0.0002511054,0.000006467536,0.0002432864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01142226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02271158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04106218183124213,"score_gpt":0.2897353541792061,"score_spread":0.248673172347964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}