{"id":"W1587922982","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01990.x","title":"Compensatory immigration depends on adjacent population size and habitat quality but not on landscape connectivity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour","keywords":"Immigration; Metapopulation; Ecology; Habitat; Population; Geography; Biology; Biological dispersal; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004606441,0.0003129862,0.0003076252,0.0003284881,0.0002314606,0.0003451165,0.0002513813,0.0001997667,0.001115275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001239091,0.0001807413,0.0003096584,0.0001127466,0.0004852203,0.0003126033,0.0006076131,0.0002712056,0.0002089961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000183821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001535504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001261839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003793542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998254,0.00004228833,0.00001866896,0.00005101545,0.00003684618,0.00002573652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998349,0.0006798338,0.000493149,0.0001545539,0.0001363904,0.0001871265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005929767,0.0001556654,0.5548215,0.0002421027,0.0001762625,0.0004341975,0.0002967456,0.002186012,0.4172906,0.0003575012,0.0002385383,0.02320787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007939854,0.0001843563,0.994769,0.00001025389,0.00002477663,0.0002201141,0.00004176421,0.00230263,0.002254405,0.00007641697,0.0001012037,0.000007122664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985995,0.00007838006,0.0004867935,0.0000106752,0.00000213623,0.000009509678,0.00003190929,0.000009386085,0.0007717482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989449,0.00007653779,0.0005730844,0.00001576163,0.000003473056,0.00001402076,0.0001244918,0.000005655732,0.0002421024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001261839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003730953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01960314938359485,"score_gpt":0.2655820829708914,"score_spread":0.2459789335872966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}