{"id":"W1588675041","doi":"10.14740/jocmr2171w","title":"Positive Endocervical Margins at Conization: Repeat Conization or Colposcopic Follow-Up? A Retrospective Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","topic":"Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cervical conization; Histopathology; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Colposcopy; Carcinoma in situ; Hysterectomy; Squamous intraepithelial lesion; Cervical cancer; Retrospective cohort study; Carcinoma; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure; Gynecology; Surgery; Cancer; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006742445,0.0002803366,0.0004337652,0.001152304,0.0005502842,0.000516542,0.0004016933,0.0006548635,0.001666981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003025219,0.0003669084,0.0004614594,0.001054475,0.0006287238,0.00046426,0.0004028578,0.0004538746,0.0003762121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002464701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003881003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00156934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001305587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993036,0.0001280478,0.00009879569,0.0002081349,0.0001357629,0.0001256929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964806,0.0009467941,0.001442995,0.0004416372,0.0002899051,0.0003981775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001153735,0.00003162747,0.9953588,0.00001578859,0.00001604992,0.002951415,0.0001095208,0.00001288652,0.0003006732,0.00000757448,0.00003615627,0.001044083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001186833,0.0006143756,0.9690295,0.00002600081,0.00007910949,0.02846902,0.0006932146,0.000109492,0.0003615246,0.00001820092,0.0005742576,0.00001335974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.0005053554,0.00006615355,0.00001094774,0.000005586379,0.00001040949,0.00006361106,0.000002384468,0.0002863163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995508,0.0001847651,0.000047548,0.00002022901,0.00001559225,0.000007919137,0.0001162151,0.000001775386,0.0000552128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001666981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00557667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3529118227366655,"score_gpt":0.5551632367295042,"score_spread":0.2022514139928386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}