{"id":"W1589089976","doi":"10.4271/2000-01-2291","title":"Ultraviolet Radiation as a Remediation Technique in Controlling Root Diseases: A Case Study with Pythium","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Pythium; Root (linguistics); Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Root rot; Radiation; Ultraviolet radiation; Computer science; Physics; Radiochemistry; Nuclear physics; Chemistry; Biology; Botany; Contamination","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563016,0.0008037738,0.0009368963,0.0008627023,0.001906081,0.0009345516,0.001093843,0.002483846,0.0007799482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001106505,0.0002561927,0.001079835,0.0006696638,0.0005915412,0.0005219352,0.0006468253,0.0008238335,0.0003134467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005661454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004222389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004337153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006934825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999274,0.0002420126,0.0000603314,0.0001276859,0.0001744078,0.000121676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993655,0.0002658072,0.0000932848,0.0000511142,0.00009253378,0.0001317269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002778398,0.02219474,0.06266205,0.004620025,0.0004311623,0.3832515,0.02209027,0.00857407,0.2647087,0.001188671,0.002094505,0.2254059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000685313,0.08833056,0.1796988,0.0006269401,0.001438601,0.3169088,0.02432922,0.01765931,0.3198095,0.00109654,0.04890919,0.0005071543],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992148,0.003109842,0.001723337,0.0003594977,0.0000276886,0.0001963417,0.00006226022,0.00002916528,0.002343926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982841,0.005626243,0.006601849,0.0002627418,0.00008736216,0.0000671337,0.00007679348,0.00002988173,0.004406856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004337153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008623838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007265490311992155,"score_gpt":0.2190688926437868,"score_spread":0.2118034023317946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}