{"id":"W1589162855","doi":"","title":"A 'Natural Experiment' on the Economics of Storks: Evidence on the Impact of Differential Family Policy on Fertility Rates in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Total fertility rate; Subsidy; Population; Birth rate; Demographic economics; Earned income tax credit; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Demography; Tax credit; Family planning; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00883725,0.0003719561,0.0007159577,0.0008481854,0.003591223,0.001483566,0.002006119,0.0008546428,0.003841237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02084891,0.0002561134,0.0006396936,0.001507904,0.005306468,0.0006654933,0.001004535,0.001047387,0.00020569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03906372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02479909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.972073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927804,0.00405585,0.0001755219,0.0007607762,0.001389644,0.0008377961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602574,0.02599648,0.006135673,0.002682293,0.003692965,0.00123519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02438078,0.009621543,0.7223797,0.001383023,0.002881317,0.0009897248,0.01363066,0.01638246,0.0054945,0.04563788,0.023178,0.1340403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002314558,0.003891074,0.954756,0.0001538154,0.0008348731,0.00007336454,0.007240214,0.005873689,0.002939677,0.004421104,0.01735875,0.0001429282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830707,0.001814364,0.0005895071,0.00155973,0.00003758923,0.0003655693,0.001731657,0.00002642328,0.01080445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945246,0.0008446052,0.0004100258,0.0004003,0.0000204123,0.00007616475,0.0006107858,0.000008789173,0.003104367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03906372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2834285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06960414284664632,"score_gpt":0.3748091740311469,"score_spread":0.3052050311845006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}