{"id":"W1589931713","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00551.x","title":"Comparison of methods to estimate historic species richness of mammals for tests of faunal relaxation in Canadian parks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Ecology; Species diversity; Sampling (signal processing); Disturbance (geology); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009446876,0.000066817,0.0002876037,0.000470695,0.00003419887,0.000002512746,0.000155474,0.00007512447,0.00009305718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001963108,0.00006170912,0.0001081641,0.0007781994,0.00009806927,0.0001132986,0.00001524421,0.00007228574,6.999753e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001077373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003700405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0342287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989455,0.00007812717,0.0006143108,0.0000781305,0.0001328845,0.0001509832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988912,0.0001636188,0.0007038916,0.00008474466,0.00006497835,0.00009154167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008390312,0.00009483614,0.9861374,0.00001173918,0.00001661626,0.00000114377,0.0002434306,0.001811854,0.008699981,0.00006454181,0.000672268,0.002162295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002447387,0.0003183191,0.9919788,0.00003273579,0.00002830391,0.000005201656,0.00008279983,0.0002486891,0.002979526,0.0004411611,0.003585025,0.00005471251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964689,0.0001449299,0.002363688,0.0003427243,0.0001612869,0.0001281999,0.00000896742,0.000001262543,0.0003800218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754294,0.00001812236,0.02447148,0.00003914952,0.00001447302,0.0000033475,0.000002119327,0.00000361307,0.00001835735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0238325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02775047454169709,"score_gpt":0.3458327178680791,"score_spread":0.318082243326382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}