{"id":"W1590785716","doi":"","title":"Reading James with new eyes : methodological reassessments of the letter of James","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"T&T Clark eBooks","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Watson; Reading (process); Theology; Rhetorical question; Ideology; Methodism; History; Art history; Classics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Politics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03266002,0.0006668819,0.0008175966,0.005712571,0.0207712,0.02051621,0.002970374,0.004036703,0.00940284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09867706,0.0006813659,0.000549271,0.007628928,0.02809832,0.0106429,0.008460223,0.008777632,0.002057523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0175555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01122284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01622393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03035523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9527311,0.03771251,0.00115126,0.002057658,0.005323148,0.001024281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8584464,0.1139568,0.003741886,0.006547871,0.01549952,0.001807614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006483903,0.00004845385,0.0004242437,0.0006429462,0.00001308976,0.0003072367,0.3235591,0.00006563106,0.0001905702,0.30912,0.3280595,0.03750439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007196443,0.00001696816,0.0008700678,0.001186224,0.000007906656,0.0001238478,0.144066,0.0000839632,0.0002087724,0.02158934,0.8318176,0.00002214026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04975883,0.05824926,0.01928045,0.4785722,0.04108788,0.0006132497,0.001238899,0.0002114832,0.3509879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6123635,0.03700058,0.02363302,0.1031829,0.0229663,0.003232468,0.0008354922,0.00168696,0.1950988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03266002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1727248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08840766101006133,"score_gpt":0.3730254044887015,"score_spread":0.2846177434786402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}