{"id":"W1590894447","doi":"10.1063/1.3131355","title":"A Fair Loss-Tolerant Quantum Coin Flipping Protocol","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIP conference proceedings","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Coin flipping; Cheating; Protocol (science); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Quantum cryptography; Cryptography; Cryptographic protocol; Quantum; Qubit; Computer security; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Quantum information; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Quantum mechanics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004027193,0.0003689663,0.0003627874,0.0001895581,0.0003423365,0.00080947,0.00157608,0.0001259311,0.00002287037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007362363,0.0003156002,0.0001161006,0.0006536054,0.0000902835,0.0006844273,0.0002789597,0.0004959596,0.000070534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000467303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001963192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001738089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.567684e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974417,0.00001840733,0.0004431829,0.0008421231,0.0005131959,0.0007413671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987751,0.00003929178,0.000232358,0.0003304581,0.0003888583,0.0002339522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007940159,0.0005171485,0.003196548,0.0002540403,0.00004500324,0.0001294073,0.01338202,0.0001039307,0.0235283,0.6109552,0.003523376,0.3442856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007014307,0.0005761372,0.004566573,0.0002902381,0.000004858732,0.0001633743,0.00007342167,0.9332045,0.001062719,0.04912749,0.009692287,0.0005369688],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07412899,0.00002133683,0.878973,0.01306125,0.0003271308,0.02384884,0.000002622855,0.001859418,0.007777371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701242,0.000001516537,0.02517606,0.001264048,0.0002205725,0.003068073,9.209758e-7,0.00001550311,0.0001291471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01693639213620867,"score_gpt":0.2628887733472808,"score_spread":0.2459523812110722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}