{"id":"W1591304100","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00030.x","title":"The Consequences of Cobenefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Externality; Natural resource economics; Government (linguistics); Carbon market; Carbon fibers; Carbon price; Greenhouse gas; Emissions trading; Market failure; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Ecology; Computer science; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01568192,0.0006519849,0.0009539161,0.0008766372,0.001001228,0.002933349,0.0009426879,0.002636409,0.005302041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07699255,0.0005337638,0.0005394323,0.0009309115,0.00361204,0.004475959,0.00185347,0.002218051,0.0002685747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00370357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003209623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002320008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002827001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991029,0.005498257,0.0003751383,0.0007629927,0.001461572,0.0008729945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916765,0.06647989,0.008671734,0.003739716,0.003158423,0.001185319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000465232,0.0003533457,0.01710205,0.0002910365,0.000219906,0.0003171196,0.0003915943,0.3205495,0.003314508,0.6083905,0.001254739,0.04735048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018714,0.000430414,0.01387143,0.00009880506,0.0001175382,0.0002453274,0.0007004184,0.194859,0.002301803,0.7807931,0.006348065,0.00004700316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.625933,0.002194392,0.2776715,0.0153578,0.0001255609,0.0005061943,0.0003235193,0.0001006141,0.07778737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869629,0.000291815,0.01079616,0.0002513507,0.0000404871,0.00007854664,0.0000215544,0.00001644555,0.00154081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01568192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08293492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1034381319552004,"score_gpt":0.199180317780122,"score_spread":0.0957421858249216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}