{"id":"W1591601192","doi":"10.5772/21546","title":"Machine Vision for Inspection: A Case Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"InTech eBooks","topic":"Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Automated optical inspection; Machine vision; Visual inspection; Electronics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Automotive industry; Automated X-ray inspection; Image processing; Tearing; Production line; Engineering drawing; Computer science; Manufacturing engineering; Automotive engineering; Mechanical engineering; Electrical engineering; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002558794,0.0003843291,0.0004399012,0.0003355903,0.0001547386,0.00005497807,0.0001068454,0.0005546769,0.00009730779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001133939,0.0003570319,0.0002294108,0.00001612846,0.00002707523,0.00003832932,0.00004443805,0.0005641251,0.0001106454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001565239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001977088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002967283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003735978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987839,0.00001213452,0.000510842,0.0003294465,0.0001759956,0.0001876816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999212,0.00004737328,0.0001078966,0.0004288365,0.0001235129,0.00008038337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008068008,0.0002199277,0.00001336419,0.0008852496,0.002232478,0.009862931,0.0065603,0.00003188767,0.01015386,0.01173047,0.01443844,0.9430643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002195248,0.003249116,0.000001143383,0.0005452897,0.0002871103,0.005692263,0.0004370123,0.0005530887,0.009798825,0.006084404,0.9699277,0.001228781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001864862,0.0002627246,0.02069103,0.000001834693,0.004318011,0.002923743,0.00007775181,0.001785391,0.9680747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8336765,0.000003624615,0.00004852829,0.000007612744,0.0007602888,0.0001515744,0.000005083141,0.0001546344,0.1651922],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04499725912952503,"score_gpt":0.2680176071996574,"score_spread":0.2230203480701324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}