{"id":"W1592170291","doi":"10.1023/a:1010503321412","title":"Plausible Reasoning and the Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Logica","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Commonsense reasoning; Computer science; Commonsense knowledge; Quantifier (linguistics); Computational linguistics; Simple (philosophy); Preference; Artificial intelligence; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Mathematics; Programming language; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01326992,0.0007869795,0.001351625,0.003014941,0.002689472,0.007643653,0.004618985,0.004221635,0.008022711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05523615,0.001341417,0.002985068,0.001794257,0.01114443,0.02400012,0.005834031,0.00642485,0.0006432965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001931116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00159664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001950004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001305208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918184,0.00466218,0.0005517582,0.001078426,0.001427073,0.0004621024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566405,0.03485827,0.002302237,0.003728246,0.001918062,0.0005527274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008016674,0.00004065741,0.000528581,0.0001507023,0.00006072247,0.0002125485,0.001737549,0.002164871,0.0006553732,0.9745176,0.00159955,0.01825155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001424969,0.000003910832,0.0001081143,0.00001338213,0.000009306539,0.00004249865,0.0001280562,0.002242779,0.0001253075,0.9964737,0.0008310217,0.000007639553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1791793,0.01108899,0.715662,0.03014258,0.000519686,0.0001404362,0.0003768273,0.0007158909,0.06217432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265168,0.001467977,0.068113,0.000683049,0.0003296476,0.00004936636,0.0002735913,0.0001035989,0.002462952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01326992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07017887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03145428239249323,"score_gpt":0.3095952774193292,"score_spread":0.278140995026836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}