{"id":"W1592266478","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2015.1051612","title":"Improving Concordance in Environmental Epidemiology: A Three-Part Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Concordance; Scrutiny; Epidemiology; Observational study; Parallels; Environmental epidemiology; Public health; Medicine; Observational methods in psychology; Environmental health; Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology; Management science; Political science; Pathology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005555996,0.0003608861,0.0008333627,0.000120094,0.0002514657,0.0000105147,0.0003070831,0.0002759829,0.0008095015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002444318,0.0003364788,0.0001038557,0.0001000941,0.001134463,0.0005401417,0.0004046847,0.001006621,0.0002322971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001919172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001281897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001773921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003576081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953055,0.001036752,0.001540048,0.0006702589,0.0004249202,0.001022538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971793,0.0003527563,0.001170038,0.000310246,0.000001831047,0.0009858432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003227543,0.0006978377,0.926071,0.00003337907,0.00002730634,0.0001555004,0.0009216714,0.0008547741,0.001715092,0.00003410132,0.00237833,0.06678821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00611248,0.005070857,0.893887,0.000162508,0.00005378091,0.001790075,0.002533716,0.003203623,0.0005115433,0.002961342,0.08287488,0.0008382168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912285,0.002230237,0.0007441307,0.004098654,0.0006052268,0.0006532135,0.00003411584,0.0000138918,0.0003919996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893602,0.001358682,0.003110264,0.005702578,0.0002418709,0.00002829324,0.00001745584,0.00004012107,0.0001406076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08049655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04582039476530763,"score_gpt":0.3136898158228918,"score_spread":0.2678694210575842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}