{"id":"W1592266478","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2015.1051612","title":"Improving Concordance in Environmental Epidemiology: A Three-Part Proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Concordance; Scrutiny; Epidemiology; Observational study; Parallels; Environmental epidemiology; Public health; Medicine; Observational methods in psychology; Environmental health; Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology; Management science; Political science; Pathology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7406238,0.003916369,0.008183585,0.01637669,0.01071762,0.03767185,0.01478807,0.06177888,0.007391684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7291992,0.006345109,0.01487039,0.01030958,0.06392886,0.05793151,0.04154179,0.04047617,0.006065773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01693453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1082649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003804341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002888268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.360419,0.3817973,0.0989741,0.02731726,0.1216478,0.009844462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1739092,0.5587621,0.02905386,0.08089007,0.1395756,0.01780917],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006566133,0.0007350333,0.004240926,0.007773549,0.0007774884,0.0005864899,0.007190037,0.002383276,0.001034745,0.6476878,0.134862,0.1920721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001549654,0.001309007,0.003485405,0.01246769,0.001225239,0.001317341,0.001908138,0.007556326,0.002026638,0.6682607,0.297864,0.001029999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001812385,0.007977596,0.2436287,0.6969289,0.02899638,0.009984486,0.0003178449,0.001123579,0.009230155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02084915,0.003698925,0.772199,0.1716782,0.009504632,0.01766833,0.0002359499,0.0003265142,0.003839421],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2593762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3198571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04582039476530763,"score_gpt":0.3136898158228918,"score_spread":0.2678694210575842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}