{"id":"W1592497980","doi":"10.21432/t2pc81","title":"Educational Rationale Metadata for Learning Objects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metadata; Instructional design; Learning object; Set (abstract data type); USable; Object (grammar); Process (computing); Educational technology; Embodied cognition; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01238308,0.0008432451,0.0007878574,0.01027954,0.002705856,0.008336571,0.001849642,0.002382738,0.0109081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05355414,0.001169751,0.001106871,0.006289464,0.00217534,0.01243414,0.00365758,0.003074214,0.005673565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00417775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00645978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008415098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01305148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882547,0.003888881,0.00315379,0.0007819205,0.003472996,0.0004477152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489753,0.01629874,0.006006772,0.01622627,0.01129617,0.001196804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002399995,0.0003188954,0.008233961,0.00160561,0.00005165019,0.0005563279,0.004346478,0.003418447,0.01005226,0.5688549,0.04317296,0.3591484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007254802,0.000155544,0.003368238,0.001323402,0.00006458114,0.000834828,0.001612304,0.01094042,0.01312806,0.09268697,0.8756331,0.0001800476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01625113,0.001143454,0.8928949,0.004816434,0.0007434012,0.003121269,0.0149545,0.01118573,0.05488922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1113885,0.001148313,0.8340449,0.0009152636,0.0002226492,0.002144897,0.02498482,0.001543298,0.02360729],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01238308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06548876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0204386556112872,"score_gpt":0.2485266621332743,"score_spread":0.2280880065219871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}