{"id":"W1592497980","doi":"10.21432/t2pc81","title":"Educational Rationale Metadata for Learning Objects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metadata; Instructional design; Learning object; Set (abstract data type); USable; Object (grammar); Process (computing); Educational technology; Embodied cognition; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003865246,0.00008848326,0.0001562556,0.0007140097,0.0005519282,0.0002551819,0.0003994695,0.00009633556,0.00019139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001475739,0.00008993206,0.00003839358,0.0004488902,0.0000842797,0.0005040939,0.00002873923,0.0006033581,0.00002198542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005951046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005685263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005767947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000300262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991838,0.00006632139,0.0002301355,0.0001688996,0.00009427412,0.0002565449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989524,0.0001877609,0.0002265102,0.00009691097,0.0002993438,0.0002370496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006596765,0.00007791512,0.1380878,0.00004971088,0.000182529,0.00004445032,0.00615921,0.001844097,0.0009508538,0.6557362,0.01909118,0.1777694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006713629,0.0005126832,0.001240188,0.00006493433,0.00002557802,0.001011482,0.007557612,0.01168247,0.0002482198,0.006982049,0.9697159,0.0002875519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4397827,0.01958873,0.1302872,0.3539348,0.004740363,0.0008730608,0.00000667299,0.0003708792,0.05041562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733454,0.00007592258,0.0154433,0.00008158113,0.0001246435,0.000006668235,0.000003599363,0.000009222433,0.01090964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4245041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0204386556112872,"score_gpt":0.2485266621332743,"score_spread":0.2280880065219871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}