{"id":"W1592786279","doi":"10.1002/rra.2585","title":"HOW PROXIMITY OF LAND USE AFFECTS STREAM FISH AND HABITAT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"River Research and Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Hatch (Canada); Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Environmental science; Watershed; STREAMS; Stream power; Habitat; Species richness; Hydrology (agriculture); Riparian buffer; Drainage basin; Electrofishing; Ecology; Land use; Sediment; Geography; Geology; Biology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001935023,0.00003821266,0.0000533254,0.00002260295,0.0002209124,0.00001896966,0.00005371898,0.00002218747,0.00002571577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003238649,0.00003173613,0.000006157235,0.0001074829,0.0006358519,0.0002873996,0.0002702926,0.00006507686,0.00001252329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001193683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001469857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006297343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008004777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995382,0.00002973471,0.00003055788,0.0001138818,0.0001030169,0.0001845677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996715,0.0001306596,0.0000144509,0.0001039869,0.000008099326,0.0000713296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003659979,0.00009681883,0.9744424,0.00001655733,0.000008841726,1.409181e-7,0.000102474,2.956448e-7,0.0001228969,0.002023048,0.02145993,0.001722985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001027091,0.00004076916,0.9601478,0.000001887384,0.000004447244,4.825008e-7,0.00007086653,0.000007850067,0.000180346,0.001411691,0.03799814,0.00003301952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936245,0.00003782494,0.0001751409,0.001939726,0.000004062424,0.0004982183,0.00001514112,0.000009174696,0.003696222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976457,0.0002512888,0.0003340726,0.00005770118,0.00001452097,0.0001661033,0.0000040174,0.000002392093,0.001524228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01653822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2342823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04207893811621459,"score_gpt":0.2966043370399659,"score_spread":0.2545253989237513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}