{"id":"W1592922268","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-13273-5_8","title":"A New Compound Metric for Software Risk Assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in computational intelligence","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metric (unit); Heuristic; Software; Software engineering; Source code; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Risk-based testing; Point (geometry); Data mining; Software development; Software construction; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Programming language; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324427,0.00187958,0.001455436,0.004349061,0.0007167421,0.003330131,0.001303895,0.001472814,0.007077732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009175855,0.000325868,0.001014205,0.004361895,0.001425351,0.007775549,0.002015943,0.002243081,0.00250467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001475692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001258546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006355676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009261387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968719,0.0005767721,0.0002545377,0.0003461976,0.001869612,0.00008090146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963889,0.001552983,0.0003853267,0.0004752392,0.001021519,0.0001761286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001036301,0.00008470234,0.001532902,0.0003751766,0.0001228052,0.0001882722,0.0001322488,0.0366592,0.006162259,0.4838952,0.02818284,0.4425608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001934495,0.0003521541,0.001945575,0.0001718469,0.0001134221,0.0009684598,0.00008631607,0.2083856,0.004345832,0.6823738,0.1011296,0.0001080489],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006115889,0.003771246,0.9550963,0.0007260322,0.0008836759,0.0001071632,0.0004869933,0.0004073874,0.03240534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1452813,0.005935596,0.8006063,0.0004996557,0.001856064,0.0004670549,0.001272704,0.0005255208,0.04355585],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007077732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02367735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09333478661709127,"score_gpt":0.3987245809411166,"score_spread":0.3053897943240254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}