{"id":"W1593331112","doi":"10.1029/2012gl052512","title":"Evidence for El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) influence on Arctic CO interannual variability through biomass burning emissions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Environmental science; Boreal; Climatology; Biomass burning; Arctic; El Niño Southern Oscillation; Atmospheric sciences; The arctic; Biomass (ecology); Arctic oscillation; Precipitation; Oceanography; Meteorology; Geography; Northern Hemisphere; Aerosol; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006744543,0.0002044436,0.0001665781,0.000300756,0.0002830785,0.0005360025,0.000181236,0.0001474686,0.001472591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001499694,0.0002145329,0.0003938899,0.0002708799,0.000337321,0.000277445,0.0003973687,0.0001833774,0.0001120058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003855432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004679224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03026367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03729427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998478,0.00005735611,0.00001275973,0.00003008013,0.00002374081,0.00002832647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987907,0.0006221002,0.0002232952,0.0000768982,0.0001372766,0.0001498659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006550915,0.0001282146,0.9524761,0.00006679556,0.0003172108,0.0002423952,0.0001562843,0.0297167,0.007982338,0.001047711,0.0005532688,0.006657873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003994796,0.00007701214,0.9545969,0.00001341391,0.000102877,0.00004794432,0.0001603359,0.0428943,0.000994336,0.0003472313,0.0007148457,0.00001087035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977921,0.00009254339,0.0001775814,0.00008553715,0.000008054849,0.000001515985,0.0001305492,0.00001155235,0.001700507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996425,0.00006576297,0.00005091189,0.00001236602,0.00000441415,8.263719e-7,0.00011723,0.000003596158,0.000102414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03026367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05644506256581935,"score_gpt":0.355653685281938,"score_spread":0.2992086227161187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}