{"id":"W1593716182","doi":"","title":"The Relevance of Rhetoric to the Study of Power in Communication and Communicative Adequacy.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International electronic journal for leadership in learning","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Relevance (law); Power (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001660795,0.0000777541,0.0001512887,0.0001531735,0.000315616,0.00006671331,0.0005524244,0.00001469607,0.00002330075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000462312,0.00004978536,0.00004898082,0.00008871114,0.0001933456,0.0001310328,0.00007107298,0.0005775406,7.21597e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001340942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003595726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005383402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03578897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987586,0.0002786717,0.0004259442,0.00008258944,0.0002289367,0.0002253332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981681,0.001125751,0.0003277491,0.0001603155,0.0002095069,0.000008566388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636719,0.0003884229,0.01158826,0.00001182957,0.0003327783,9.996846e-7,0.2360721,0.01107152,0.00005463701,0.7343189,0.0003635219,0.005533365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327944,0.000757922,0.008183934,0.000255929,0.0000472366,0.000007148035,0.9146303,0.0009598039,0.00004009403,0.01945302,0.05418314,0.000153537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571838,0.01438633,0.0001388483,0.01554379,0.0002098125,0.0004924227,0.000002652678,0.000007613029,0.01203467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977748,0.0003582565,0.0000177214,0.00003499027,0.00006507435,0.00003075092,0.00000184552,0.000008826131,0.001707675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7148659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05683605871269255,"score_gpt":0.3183059145169307,"score_spread":0.2614698558042382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}