{"id":"W1594610125","doi":"10.18438/b8g338","title":"Citation Analysis Shows Promise as an Effective Tool for Monograph Collection Development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Collection development; Subject (documents); Library science; Publishing; Citation analysis; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1645661,0.002745813,0.004024674,0.1198248,0.00561135,0.02654319,0.00456456,0.002164429,0.03712771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4117041,0.00203978,0.003536814,0.1128355,0.004351688,0.03054826,0.007352307,0.00338044,0.02000696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005907892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01198076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008135298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01274982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8659067,0.05931394,0.02027455,0.007163637,0.04654287,0.000798378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3527185,0.3848791,0.02584434,0.05908976,0.1736062,0.003862131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004975473,0.00005249292,0.003578187,0.005609683,0.0002897219,0.00006065105,0.001893093,0.0001989736,0.0003006942,0.01190883,0.08810108,0.8879568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001096714,0.0002225531,0.02461268,0.01318756,0.0007680709,0.0004238197,0.004485868,0.002776549,0.002038652,0.04308007,0.9078135,0.0004810998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02087197,0.2272952,0.302127,0.09327047,0.02583822,0.007886518,0.03715988,0.02788919,0.2576614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07899908,0.1155607,0.7259619,0.006051031,0.01060755,0.00788674,0.01490314,0.006000092,0.03402982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8703189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0200606157472207,"score_gpt":0.2610440247743862,"score_spread":0.2409834090271655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}