{"id":"W1594740803","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02038.x","title":"Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: A simulation study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Statistics; Reliability (semiconductor); Parametric statistics; Mathematics; Rubric; Robust confidence intervals; Population; Sample (material); CDF-based nonparametric confidence interval; Arithmetic; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01315649,0.0001055956,0.0005789927,0.0001032135,0.0001640775,0.00008767207,0.0003217199,0.00005164213,0.00007753111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.170638,0.00006283245,0.00008894416,0.0001906855,0.0003060947,0.0001060816,0.00005887541,0.0001655392,7.407168e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008547442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002388925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.522258e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.770212e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996898,0.000522209,0.001496816,0.0001961745,0.0006051113,0.0002816896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231047,0.07521234,0.0008126289,0.0001284454,0.0006350264,0.0001068399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001026193,0.001860829,0.03135046,0.0004255964,0.0001495085,0.000004996781,0.002102349,0.000443941,0.0006260576,0.0309036,0.0007271382,0.9303793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005072211,0.01138059,0.2860393,0.0006926906,0.0003086374,0.002547823,0.006752347,0.2076899,0.00012781,0.4789921,0.00007283466,0.0003237718],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5396488,0.0002213925,0.4594357,0.00006876617,0.0002024445,0.0003662117,0.00001527828,0.000002304246,0.0000391711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001005,0.00001138012,0.09968421,0.00006774196,0.00009662277,0.00002057283,3.488578e-7,0.000006210743,0.00001240467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8363481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5157300170116348,"score_gpt":0.571068175661356,"score_spread":0.05533815864972125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}