{"id":"W1595274314","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4109","title":"A Dialectical Analysis of the Ad Baculum Fallacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068537,0.0006730738,0.0009754513,0.004772628,0.005445227,0.006689634,0.001707299,0.003443747,0.006611894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03062401,0.000523895,0.001064861,0.002646286,0.01397622,0.01220586,0.006739357,0.004490646,0.0006244709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005298645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003086329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002244705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001283269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849675,0.009487572,0.0006773317,0.001123076,0.003016037,0.0007284906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987552,0.008773779,0.000702722,0.0009320067,0.001659207,0.0003802774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001143664,0.000006314368,0.000121916,0.00002394947,0.000005521405,0.00004901755,0.0007468228,0.0006684961,0.00008671645,0.9936935,0.0002731947,0.004313105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004854788,0.000006764586,0.00005500685,0.00004056554,0.000004279901,0.00004567775,0.0003962187,0.005817349,0.000180064,0.9882641,0.005179757,0.000005345159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0481428,0.001770125,0.8109252,0.0105118,0.0003807857,0.0002712517,0.0001215539,0.0002360229,0.1276405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8032702,0.000468455,0.1872159,0.0007142146,0.000122899,0.0002873102,0.0001088953,0.00007490358,0.00773726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01068537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05651033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01772763326987384,"score_gpt":0.2423597307656957,"score_spread":0.2246320974958218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}