{"id":"W1595274314","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i3.4109","title":"A Dialectical Analysis of the Ad Baculum Fallacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002953074,0.00005874038,0.0001370951,0.00008986589,0.00006420309,0.00004130564,0.0004632425,0.00004004228,0.0000283508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009557723,0.00003429194,0.000139572,0.0006724037,0.00002340252,0.000240283,0.0001420137,0.00005466438,0.00004494958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001078518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001737835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005578463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004296875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992868,0.00005144273,0.000226035,0.00009496865,0.0002110514,0.0001297319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993707,0.00006401339,0.0001208582,0.0003611861,0.00004916051,0.00003406062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002238208,0.0002231253,0.1826281,0.00009582235,0.0007725986,0.000002132304,0.006018231,0.01462222,0.002382003,0.7090219,0.001204784,0.08300674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001562992,0.00004835457,0.4688553,0.000005176561,0.00005520583,0.00000137605,0.000009982089,0.5233345,0.0003451517,0.0002378036,0.006871585,0.00007926595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2680725,0.00002193982,0.7025346,0.0005341657,0.0006294441,0.0001779086,0.000002146719,0.00007201317,0.02795538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980533,0.000001430881,0.001393294,0.0003279194,0.00002255031,0.000003654024,0.000001153409,0.000001153784,0.0001955142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7299809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1398385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01772763326987384,"score_gpt":0.2423597307656957,"score_spread":0.2246320974958218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}