{"id":"W1595545280","doi":"10.1080/03906701.1987.9971334","title":"The household division of labour in young dual‐earner couples the case of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Dual (grammatical number); Division (mathematics); Sociology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Market economy; Mathematics; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00159629,0.00005286742,0.000171203,0.00001810106,0.0001109969,0.000003533494,0.0003509093,0.00006181712,0.00005317083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001192971,0.00003113936,0.00005618003,0.00008237748,0.0006556456,0.00002814759,0.00005516553,0.000177876,3.861432e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004453605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004926097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.320697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7682061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990332,0.0001864339,0.0003512143,0.00008191572,0.0002244626,0.0001227663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998558,0.0007280058,0.0002778469,0.0001336053,0.0002813899,0.00002114767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005137197,0.00004460859,0.1718199,0.0002137209,0.00005539047,0.0000199477,0.005034362,0.00002446097,0.0004319016,0.8179578,0.001826779,0.002566108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004683485,0.00005464406,0.8500194,0.000724912,0.00003743822,0.00005103316,0.02929119,0.0002548861,0.00004993237,0.03413295,0.08470099,0.0002143122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857283,0.005330993,0.000008513256,0.003836231,0.000837868,0.0001349514,0.00008210543,0.00000228987,0.004038783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978681,0.02062144,0.00002892048,0.0003144965,0.00006014756,0.000006489144,0.000003680676,0.000003554304,0.000280247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7838248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01923676428177433,"score_gpt":0.3132988920302331,"score_spread":0.2940621277484587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}