{"id":"W1595545280","doi":"10.1080/03906701.1987.9971334","title":"The household division of labour in young dual‐earner couples the case of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Dual (grammatical number); Division (mathematics); Sociology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Market economy; Mathematics; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001676952,0.0003212717,0.0006616492,0.002318325,0.02926908,0.006067683,0.002220278,0.002050632,0.004959665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00337788,0.0003453671,0.0003696106,0.005672315,0.01001974,0.0017061,0.004448557,0.002199153,0.0001932216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0969512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1415357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974682,0.0004162825,0.00003467792,0.0001380835,0.0003032181,0.001639469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977381,0.0003992474,0.0001607402,0.00006015359,0.0006143706,0.001027466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002140747,0.000200119,0.1289974,0.0002773774,0.0000697036,0.008601741,0.5542327,0.001156547,0.0007031434,0.1934035,0.02298146,0.0891623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001874425,0.00003127578,0.1121057,0.0005324039,0.00004218356,0.0008929767,0.8070267,0.0005516767,0.000135221,0.005710396,0.07287481,0.00007782244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9294982,0.01374546,0.0002917064,0.01287976,0.0001612647,0.00006690538,0.0002567459,0.000006824635,0.04309314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864036,0.005355186,0.0001503962,0.000669374,0.00001991513,0.00002107324,0.00004928517,0.000005441297,0.007325719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0969512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7034335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01923676428177433,"score_gpt":0.3132988920302331,"score_spread":0.2940621277484587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}