{"id":"W1597492954","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4209","title":"Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quality (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0632002,0.0007119278,0.002215049,0.009197053,0.005374385,0.01839279,0.002984636,0.00859065,0.009238834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2466972,0.001053573,0.001518617,0.005430138,0.04127612,0.03201275,0.01091138,0.008496668,0.000838684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005607587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002364679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001246079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009836748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.936971,0.04266458,0.00405748,0.003695534,0.01067925,0.001932124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6301045,0.3189756,0.01369281,0.01688757,0.01666871,0.003670799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007366732,0.00003136501,0.001620883,0.0001351863,0.00003447201,0.00005732754,0.003275815,0.0007940316,0.00008761285,0.9852497,0.0005104468,0.008129564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000225289,0.00001393004,0.000484021,0.0001098694,0.00001354801,0.00003794835,0.0006197219,0.002242083,0.00006400404,0.9951476,0.001230325,0.00001433166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.282894,0.0113512,0.3330892,0.07324914,0.0008445648,0.000351534,0.0003409281,0.0003870501,0.2974925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770461,0.0005158443,0.01965956,0.0009313098,0.0002451035,0.0001067463,0.00005913166,0.000118278,0.001317994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0632002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3342385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1430148412591559,"score_gpt":0.3319198136403934,"score_spread":0.1889049723812375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}