{"id":"W1597492954","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i1.4209","title":"Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Quality (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001146653,0.0001112735,0.0001582228,0.00006683114,0.00009942701,0.00006621284,0.00007880823,0.00005841801,0.00009752437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001024748,0.0000865153,0.00003562299,0.00002139547,0.0002524208,0.0003372385,0.00003484287,0.0001722622,0.0001204233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003591581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003679736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001795971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004388246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991365,0.0001181734,0.0003008302,0.0001141847,0.0001622462,0.0001680399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995164,0.000131019,0.0001050185,0.0001249798,0.00005947844,0.00006316455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007054531,0.00005421007,0.0009192513,0.00002609152,0.000009612875,0.000001770524,0.03590586,0.00001885776,0.000008167712,0.9608622,0.0001114193,0.002011977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002236093,0.001236626,0.01175051,0.0000563421,0.00002897439,0.000004689562,0.06845105,0.00007404784,0.0003527686,0.8055074,0.1097747,0.0005268587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6123546,0.0001557508,0.00005492749,0.0003125059,0.0005212763,0.0001793762,0.00001635728,0.00003898226,0.3863662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947816,0.00002692836,0.00004796832,0.002227899,0.0001514323,0.00001946244,0.00002170803,0.00000494908,0.00271802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3836482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3527991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1430148412591559,"score_gpt":0.3319198136403934,"score_spread":0.1889049723812375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}