{"id":"W1597658163","doi":"10.1007/s12286-013-0166-5","title":"Justifying corrupt exchanges: rational-choice corruptors","year":2013,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Language change; Normative; Rational choice theory (criminology); Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Political science; Perception; Institutionalisation; Democracy; State (computer science); Public economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131207,0.001146719,0.001143659,0.0006611839,0.00191095,0.001101813,0.001172948,0.0009340259,0.0374603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001075503,0.00131006,0.0005635858,0.0009678926,0.0007749592,0.001482392,0.0005464896,0.001096807,0.05687511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004404311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001481381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01549509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001345153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991708,0.0006659701,0.001722303,0.001674153,0.001369401,0.002860223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441,0.001033927,0.000821674,0.001069851,0.000787331,0.001877187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001759505,0.002038801,0.03808068,0.0007533275,0.00181158,0.000139772,0.07464113,0.0004690067,0.002930591,0.6056059,0.2085932,0.06476009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001441222,0.0001347924,0.02988433,0.0002364976,0.0002171733,0.00001668719,0.01512154,0.001263298,0.0002660132,0.0003048062,0.9493594,0.001754308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3321921,0.01653449,0.0009020924,0.0421241,0.04626225,0.005409296,0.0003370121,0.001823071,0.5544156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047472,0.001609508,0.0008551867,0.004614883,0.007367073,0.0003118387,0.0002370418,0.0001905664,0.08006671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7407662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04212203752153664,"score_gpt":0.3256688242689143,"score_spread":0.2835467867473777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}