{"id":"W1597658163","doi":"10.1007/s12286-013-0166-5","title":"Justifying corrupt exchanges: rational-choice corruptors","year":2013,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Language change; Normative; Rational choice theory (criminology); Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Political science; Perception; Institutionalisation; Democracy; State (computer science); Public economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01781156,0.001040656,0.001799171,0.00113798,0.002103151,0.007663648,0.002209509,0.008962313,0.01281532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07723573,0.0007866495,0.001361894,0.001063262,0.008885492,0.008748422,0.003298976,0.00598246,0.0006391427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00393456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004511632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002422472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002495022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882857,0.008412841,0.0004564406,0.001070699,0.0008737961,0.0009005683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8974408,0.08794343,0.005705296,0.005121115,0.002521556,0.001267728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204962,0.00006818652,0.0006932579,0.00007721263,0.00004555849,0.0001129718,0.0003191237,0.01323176,0.00009470869,0.9795338,0.001520381,0.004182623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005689991,0.00001397015,0.00008856449,0.00001784069,0.00001283927,0.00001123516,0.00009791611,0.02170026,0.00006644894,0.9769767,0.0009499477,0.000007436235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.259526,0.003010051,0.4501775,0.09987257,0.0007981807,0.0005183564,0.0004315256,0.0002883275,0.1853776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974297,0.0006316428,0.01695617,0.0009446862,0.0002948644,0.0001405466,0.00005729912,0.00003797614,0.006639747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01781156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09419769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04212203752153664,"score_gpt":0.3256688242689143,"score_spread":0.2835467867473777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}