{"id":"W1597675405","doi":"","title":"Caller Number Five and Related Timing Games","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Function (biology); Stochastic game; Class (philosophy); Attrition; Rank (graph theory); Best response; Order (exchange); Characterization (materials science); Perfect information; Repeated game; Computer science; Economics; Game theory; Mathematics; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004324094,0.0003363912,0.0007550218,0.0001956534,0.0003627415,0.0000609748,0.0002462598,0.0002708331,0.006860004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001017677,0.000413036,0.0002095913,0.0001164329,0.0005371491,0.0005053991,0.0001337831,0.000322695,0.00368987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000195334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007507718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002474585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003881573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976354,0.00002483352,0.000981095,0.0007825614,0.00003112789,0.0005449743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985858,0.0001595141,0.0004617875,0.0005066173,0.00003461667,0.0002516816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937292,0.00005525463,0.7475667,0.00001739801,0.0001594374,0.00003945645,0.001948003,0.00004059836,0.000007310001,0.2399043,0.01004694,0.0001952235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006577121,0.0002527539,0.4535107,0.0001374089,0.00007492528,0.003154826,0.001337376,0.00776447,0.0001670187,0.1484056,0.3748863,0.003731498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7816319,0.002045444,0.0001311753,0.0003373053,0.001225361,0.0001879411,0.000131912,0.00009797695,0.214211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688879,0.0009155268,0.001061158,0.0003621913,0.0001783992,0.00003213453,0.00001685276,0.00006100983,0.0284848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3648394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02388684164764939,"score_gpt":0.2102604220053516,"score_spread":0.1863735803577022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}