{"id":"W1597727458","doi":"10.1023/a:1011871723686","title":"Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Québec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; University of Texas at Austin; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Riparian zone; Endangered species; Wetland; Logging; Population; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Ecology; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001779939,0.0003626191,0.0003741598,0.001805241,0.0017691,0.001850485,0.001223621,0.0004337566,0.0102225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005545174,0.0001686169,0.0005168247,0.003220804,0.0007471147,0.0008542166,0.0005764483,0.0004340525,0.0002432959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03484557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02552444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986361,0.0004188696,0.00004201486,0.0001350737,0.000349094,0.0004188518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964121,0.001113283,0.0001976898,0.00008220982,0.001818674,0.0003761127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002093531,0.0002749187,0.802931,0.0003811358,0.0004751338,0.0007616819,0.001755179,0.03373891,0.003617105,0.01684094,0.01820836,0.1189222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002022348,0.0001768034,0.9322842,0.00009295044,0.00025256,0.0001198551,0.004520772,0.04776769,0.0008295508,0.001951094,0.01174292,0.00005939265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742573,0.001929523,0.002853293,0.001651913,0.0000292707,0.0003479887,0.003069163,0.00004681389,0.01581477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911907,0.0003520727,0.002323137,0.0001605321,0.00000934774,0.0000623104,0.0007438475,0.00001216499,0.005146003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03484557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2528235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02681378616058882,"score_gpt":0.2046665397724463,"score_spread":0.1778527536118574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}